
Why The Ideal-Scope Sucks
Monday, August 6th, 2007Readers of this blog may think that we are the world’s number 1 Ideal-Scope fans. To counter-act such claims, we’ve made this list of top 10 reasons why the Ideal-Scope sucks.

Readers of this blog may think that we are the world’s number 1 Ideal-Scope fans. To counter-act such claims, we’ve made this list of top 10 reasons why the Ideal-Scope sucks.

A common question that we get asked is “Do you sell Argyle diamonds?”.

The Angular Spectrum Evaluation Tool (ASET) from AGS assesses the cut quality of a diamond in much the same way as the Ideal-Scope, using reflection technology.

Despite the cost and advancements in technology, gadgets such as proportion analysers and The BrillianceScope still have a margin of error built into them that needs to be verified with old fashioned tools such as micrometers.

The GIA will give any round diamond a maximum cut grade of “Very Good” to a diamond with a “Very Thin” girdle.

If you think there’s only a handful of shapes to choose from when buying a diamond, think again.

Spread is a term used to describe how big a diamond is, and is usually measured by the diameter or length and width of a diamond.

Recently we got in two GIA “triple excellents”.


As you may or may not know, most diamonds from Jogia Diamonds are put under the microscope (amongst other things) for customers to approve prior to purchasing.